|
Y2K
Resources

2000
JCAHO Workshops
The Arkansas Hospital Association will sponsor in 2000 the following
workshops offered by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare
Organizations. All three workshops will be presented in Little Rock.
January
28
Performance Measurement & Performance Improvement in
all Home Care and Hospice Organizations
(Addresses JCAHO 1999-2000 accreditation standards for IOP and related
standards; leadership role in selecting an approach to process improvement,
setting priorities, and creating a corporate culture; quality improvement
tools and measurement techniques; and performance measurement requirements
of the JCAHO ORYX initiative.)
March
31
Team Approach to Conducting a Root Cause Analysis
(Participants will utilize case studies and tools during hands-on
practice sessions to conduct a root cause analysis.)
August
10
Hospital Accreditation Standards and Survey Process: The Advanced
Course
(Addresses survey process and standards including: standards that
most frequently receive "Type I" recommendations; highlights
of changes in standards and survey process for the upcoming year;
strategies for successful survey outcome; and "scoring changes"
that can impact your organization's accreditation score.)

Arkansas
Tobacco Money Timeframe
A task force of 20 members of the Arkansas House of Representatives
began meeting in August to decide on plans for both receiving the
state's $1.62 billion tobacco settlement money and spending it.
At the same time, they were faced with questions about when the
state's share will be available.
According
to the Arkansas Attorney General's office, in order for any state
to begin receiving its share of the settlement funds, it must achieve
a status called "state specific finality" (SSF). Forty-two
states have achieved that status. Arkansas is not among those states,
although it has about $20 million in escrow for 1998.
If
Arkansas obtains the SSF status by June 30, 2000, it will be eligible
to begin receiving money the next day, July 1. The single obstruction
to Arkansas getting its SSF is a disagreement between the state
and a California law firm that says it has a contract with former
state Attorney General Winston Bryant entitling it to a substantial
percentage of the state's share as legal fees.
Current
Attorney General Mark Pryor is contesting the alleged contract,
meaning a final decision will probably come through the courts.
If the dispute is not settled in or out of court by next June 30,
receipt of the money will be delayed until a final decision is made.

Transitioning
for Patient Discharge
According to the Picker Institute of Boston, Massachusetts, patients
report significant dissatisfaction with the discharge process. Picker
research finds that patients leave the hospital not understanding
their medications or the side effects to watch out for, lacking
knowledge of danger signals and without knowing when they can resume
usual activities.
Improving
the discharge experience for patients is everyone's job. Improvements
may require systematic, multi-level process changes that involve
various departments and providers or may be the result of a few
simple interventions. A study done by Brigham and Women's Hospital
and Harvard Community Health Plan, for example, found that a patient's
discharge experience can be improved by clarifying who is responsible
for making the decisions and follow-up care.
Other
simple strategies may include involving family members more directly,
or reducing the amount of time a patient must wait for such things
as an escort to the lobby or for their medications. It is also important
to patients that their primary physician is informed about their
hospitalizations so they can transition smoothly from the hospital
to the community.
Other
suggestions:
-
Use pre-hospital telephone calls to identify post-hospital needs
and concerns.
-
Increase patient responsibility to closely mimic the "real
world"
-
Telephone patients after discharge to provide education and support
-
Offer a telephone information service to answer questions and
provide information about community resources.
-
Use volunteers or home health aides to facilitate the transition
to home.
-
Share clinical pathways with patients as part of pre-admission
work-up so they know exactly what to expect.

New
Information Available on Prospective Employees
Arkansas Act 1474 of 1999, the Quality in Hiring Act, enables employers
to receive accurate and reliable job performance information about
prospective employees. Under the act, current or former employers
will be immune from any civil liability for either the disclosure
of employment history, or any consequences that arise from the disclosure
of employment history; unless generally the employee can prove that
the information disclosed was false and the employer knew it was
false. Now, employers may disclose the following information:
-
Date and duration of employment
-
Current pay rate and wage history
-
Job description and duties
-
The last written performance evaluation prepared before the date
of the request
-
Attendance information
-
Results of drug and alcohol tests administered within one year
before the request
-
Threats of violence, harassing acts, or threatening behavior related
to the workplace or directed at another employee
-
Whether the employee was voluntarily or involuntarily separated
from employment and the reasons for the separation
-
Whether the employee is eligible for rehire
Employment
applications should include a consent form, which is separate from
the application. The consent form should state the following information:
I,
(applicant) give consent to any and all prior employers to provide
information with regard to my employment with prior employers to
(prospective employer).
The
consent must be signed and dated by the applicant. The consent is
valid for the length of time that the application is considered
active by the prospective employer, but no longer than six months.
For
a copy of Act 1474, go to www.arkhospitals.org.
Click "Governmental Issues" and, then "Arkansas General
Assembly, January 1999." Under "view act," enter
"1474" and click on "submit."

National
Healthcare Spending Projections
A new report by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA)
projects that national healthcare spending will grow over the next
eight years more slowly than originally thought. The new projections
by HCFA's Office of the Actuary says spending will increase at a
6.5% rate between 1997 and 2007. Last year the office projected
growth for the period at 7% per year.
The
downward revision reflects slower-than-expected Medicare spending
in 1998 and slower projected growth in both private and Medicare
spending in the latter five years of the projection period. By 2008,
total national healthcare spending will double to $2.2 trillion,
representing 16.2% of the nation's Gross Domestic Product, according
to the report, which will be published in the July/August 1999 summer
issue of Health Affairs.
HCFA
actuaries project faster growth in private spending due to sharper
increases in private health insurance costs next year and a continued
upward spiral in prescription drug costs. Medicare spending should
ease overall growth. The revised projections show those expenses
growing at a 4.5% clip between 1997 and 2000, down from the previous
estimate of a 5.1% annual growth rate.
JCAHO,
Health Department Meet
Act 506 of 1999 provides for the voluntary substitution of hospital
surveys conducted by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare
Organizations (JCAHO) for surveys conducted by the Arkansas Department
of Health (ADH). In other words, JCAHO-accredited facilities may
elect to avoid a duplicative regulatory survey by the ADH.
To
help ensure a smooth transition for hospitals that choose this survey
option, representatives of the Joint Commission met recently with
the full survey team of the ADH to discuss the survey process and
how the new arrangement will benefit hospitals in the state.
The
JCAHO team provided details about the organization's standards and
survey process; surveyor education and training; accreditation categories,
policies, and procedures; continuous survey readiness program; public
release of information; publications; and information about their
Web site, www.jcaho.org.

Access
Arkansas Data Via Internet
Since 1993, the Arkansas Hospital Association has published the
quarterly magazine, Arkansas Hospitals. In each of those years,
the summer issue of the magazine has been dedicated to information
about the state's hospitals. That is true of the Summer 1999 issue,
which was distributed in July.
Because
the summer magazine contains a wide array of general information,
comparative data, and statistics about Arkansas' hospitals, it has
historically been one of the most requested of all AHA publications.
The complete set of information is now available via the AHA's Web
site.
The
site includes tables and charts showing hospital utilization trends,
financial indicators, state-by-state comparisons of hospital costs
and charges and selected indicators per 1,000 population. It also
shows which hospitals are members of larger systems, both for-profit
and not-for-profit, and gives a brief synopsis of services available
in each AHA-member hospital.
To
find the information on the Web site, go to www.arkhospitals.org,
click on "publications," then click on "Arkansas
Hospitals Magazine Archive," and choose "Summer 1999."
Questions should be directed to Paul Cunningham at (501) 224-7878.

HMO
Pulling Medicare Plans
Several of the largest Medicare health maintenance organizations
(HMOs) in the U.S. issued announcements June 30 and July 1 that
they will pull their plans from select Medicare markets, effective
January 1, 2000. Altogether, nearly 100 plans are set to pull out
of the Medicare program or reduce the size of their service area.
The Pullouts will affect about 325,000 Medicare beneficiaries, according
to figures published July 15 by the health Care Financing Administration.
Two thousand of the beneficiaries live in Arkansas.
Karen
Ignagni, president of the American Association of Health Plans,
said all 6.2 million Medicare managed care beneficiaries will be
impacted by the loss of available HMOs through a combination of
premium increases and benefit reductions, and that 79,000 enrollees
in managed care plans will be forced back into Medicare's fee-for-service
program. According to Ignagni, the pullouts are caused by three
factors: insufficient Medicare managed care payments, added regulatory
burdens and increasing provider costs.

Plane
Crash Tests Skills of Local EMS Providers
By Natalie Gardner
Getting
a call in the middle of the night is not unusual for an emergency
room physician. So, when Dr. Marvin Leibovich, medical director
of the emergency department at Baptist Medical Center, got a call
late June 1, he wasn't expecting what he heard on the other end
of the line.
"The
hospital called me--I had already gone to bed and was asleep-- just
to let me know our internal disaster plan, a Red Alert, had been
issued. There had been a crash out at the airport and they were
expecting multiple casualties."
While
Dr. Leibovich was getting ready to go to Baptist, he received another
call from the Little Rock Police Department. Dr. Leibovich, also
a Little Rock police officer, was asked to come to the scene and
help with the many seriously injured.
Even
though Dr. Leibovich has been involved with many disasters through
the years, including January's tragic tornado [in Little Rock and
the surrounding area], he wasn't ready for what he saw at the Little
Rock National Airport.
American
Airlines Flight 1420 crashed during a severe thunderstorm. Broken
in half, the jet slid off the runway toward the Arkansas River.
The crash killed 11 and seriously injured several.
"When
I got there, there was already a sea of red lights from rescue personnel,"
Dr. Leibovich said. "The plane was off the approach way of
the runway, badly mangled and broken in sections. There was a fire
that had just been extinguished. All around were these colored tarps,
signifying the different levels of injuries."
Although
most of the seriously injured passengers had been triaged and evaluated
when Dr. Leibovich arrived, rescue personnel continued searching
the site looking for any passengers that might have been ejected
from the plane.
"There
was an excellent lighting system in the plane, but if you stepped
a few feet away from the plane, you were in total darkness,"
he said. "That and the torrential downpour made it difficult."
Dr.
Leibovich helped with the 40-50 people with minor injuries. They
were quickly taken to nearby hospitals.
Lessons
Learned
Planning was the key to successful implementation of the disaster
plan. Working together, hospital staff, police, firefighters and
paramedics got injured passengers the help they needed quickly,
Dr. Leibovich said. "We could learn a lot from the lessons
of this tragedy," he said. "Had it not been for planning,
things could have been a whole lot worse."
Quicker
notification about the disaster to emergency medical service providers
and area hospitals could have assisted emergency response, Dr. Leibovich
said. "But overall, things were handled very well, and there
were no lives lost because of a delay," he said.
Preparing
for Disaster
Little Rock's last plane crash occurred almost 10 years ago when
an Eastman Kodak corporate jet crashed with seven on board. Yet,
American Airlines flight 1420 had 139 passengers. Even so, healthcare
providers and rescue personnel were ready.
The
airport is required to schedule a disaster drill very three years,
which includes participation from city EMS providers. Area hospitals
are required by their certifying agencies to conduct internal disaster
drills twice a year.
"Fortunately,
all hospitals implemented their internal disaster plans," Dr.
Leibovich said. "At our hospital, there was an excellent response.
Trauma surgeons were all in, orthopedic surgeons were here waiting
on patients, and we had excellent response by emergency nursing
staff. Administration was extremely supportive of us. And talking
with other hospitals and physicians, they all had a good exercise.
"It
was very fortunate, in this particular aircraft accident, that there
had been a degree of deceleration before impact occurred. Had that
impact occurred initially, most of the people would have died in
that crash. We were very fortunate, that unlike other crashes with
75 or so critical patients, we didn't have that many and we were
able to keep up with the injuries."
Reprinted
from the Journal of the Arkansas Medical Society, July 1999

Little
Rock Hospitals Respond Following Crash
Once again, Arkansas hospitals and the people who work in them were
called on to provide care in a time of tragedy, and once more they
responded quickly and professionally when the call came, just before
midnight June 1.
This
time, the hospitals were in Little Rock and North Little Rock and
the tragedy was the first-ever commercial airline accident to occur
at the Little Rock National Airport. Within minutes after American
Airlines Flight 1420 crashed and burned when landing at the airport,
area hospitals had implemented their external disaster plans.
Codes
and alerts were issued and call-trees activated; emergency teams
- surgeons, emergency physicians, residents, nurses, and all the
necessary support staff - began assembling at the hospitals to meet
incoming ambulances, just as they've practiced time after time over
the years. Inside, rooms were prepared and supplies that might be
needed were brought into the hospitals' emergency areas.
The
routine was the same as for other disasters, which, in Arkansas,
are normally caused by severe weather. But, according to Dr. Carolyn
Haynes, a physician at University Hospital, the types of injuries
were different. Haynes said the injuries more closely resembled
a massive high-speed car accident.
Eighty-six
of the 145 passengers and crew who were aboard the aircraft were
transported for emergency care to Arkansas Children's Hospital,
Arkansas Heart Hospital, Baptist Medical Center, Baptist Memorial
Medical Center, St. Vincent Infirmary Medical Center, Southwest
Regional Medical Center, and University Hospital.
At
the hospitals, the patients were triaged to identify the nature
and seriousness of their injuries, prioritized and routed to physicians
who assessed and treated their injuries, which ranged from broken
bones to major chest and head trauma. Most of the injured were treated
and released, but 34 patients were admitted to the hospitals, including
two passengers who suffered burn injuries. Eleven people died from
injuries suffered in the accident.
|